This site collects anonymous statistical data on navigation through cookies installed by authorized third parties, respecting privacy of your personal data and in accordance with standards established by law. By continuing to browse this site, clicking on links in it or simply shaking the page down, you agree to the service and the same cookie.

A+ A A-
27-03-2015

Ukraine weekly update: March 15 – March 21

Rate this item
(6 votes)
Ukraine weekly update: March 15 – March 21 EEC PRESS

Five weeks have passed since the beginning of the truce in eastern Ukraine. Triage’s updates’ purpose is to provide a report on the implementation status of the first three point of Minsk II agreement:

1.      Immediate and full ceasefire and its strict fulfilment as of 00.00 (Kiev time) on February 15.

2.      Pull-out of all heavy weapons by both sides to equal distance to create a security zone on minimum 50 kilometres apart for artillery of 100mm calibre or more, of 70km for MLRS and 140 kilometres for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch and tactical missile systems Tochka U.

3.      Monitoring and verification of ceasefire regime and pull-out of heavy weapons by OSCE.

 

Week 1: February 15 – February 21. As of February 18, there were almost no signs of Minsk agreement’s first three points being respected: fierce fighting was reported, heavy weapons were not withdrawn from the frontline and OSCE’s inspectors’ access and freedom of movement were restricted.

Week 2: February 22 – February 28. As of February 24, despite some light improvement, the overall situation did not change: again, exchanges of fire were reported, there was confusion over weapons withdrawal and OSCE monitoring mission was restricted.

Week 3: March 1 – March 7. Fighting of variable intensity took place almost exclusively in Donetsk region: although it seemed that the number of violations had lowered if compared those occurred in previous two weeks, the overall situation remained unstable.

Week 4: March 8 – March 14. No particular developments were noted; the parties were more compliant with Minsk II measures in Lugansk region than in Donetsk. It seemed that fighting increased in the area of Shyrokyne, not far from Mariupol.

 

Week 5: March 15 – March 21. The situation in eastern Ukraine is still quite unpredictable and could easily change; there are little guarantees regarding full implementation of Minsk II agreement in the short period.

Violations of Minsk II Measure 1 continued, although it seems that there was a slight improvement regarding the number of ceasefire violations: according to the data extrapolated from SMM reports, 53 episodes occurred in Week 5 while 60 occurred in Week 4. The situation in and around Donetsk is till unstable. In fact 43,4% of all episodes registered by the SMM (23 out of 53) occurred in Donetsk and in its outskirt, and involved the areas in and around government-controlled towns of Pisky (12km north-west), Opytne (13km north-west) and Avdiivka (15km north-west) as well as DPR-controlled[1], Spartak area (7km north-west) and Donetsk’s airport area 10km north-west). Ceasefire violations occurred almost entirely within Donetsk region (or Oblast): 48 out of 53 episodes. The situation around Shyrokyne deteriorated: 21 out of 53 episodes (39,6%) occurred in that area, 18 more than the week before.

Violations of Minsk II Measure 2 continued and consisted in the use of heavy weapons, in the presence of heavy weapons (stationary or on the move)[2]; and in the absence of heavy weapons in chosen storage sites. Ceasefire violation caused by the heavy weapons fire reached a new peak this week: 20 episodes. However, it should be noted that there were cases in which both side complied with Minsk agreement: in 3 Ukrainian Armed Force (UFA) sites, visited on March 15, the SMM confirmed the presence of all previously observed weapons; the location of 3 UFA storage sites that the SMM visited on March 17 complied with the respective withdrawal lines; the contents of 3 UFA and 8 DPR storage sites that the SMM visited on March 19 complied with the respective withdrawal lines; the contents of 3 UFA and 5 DPR sites that the SMM visited on March 21 was the same of previous visits; finally, 5 UFA and 3 DPR heavy weapons holding areas that the SMM visited on March 21 complied with the respective withdrawal lines.

Violation of Minsk II Measure 3 continued too. The SMM suffered from restriction on access and freedom of movement: the SMM was prevented from accessing buildings, town/villages, and particular areas; in many occasions the SMM was stopped at UFA/DPR/LPR checkpoints (CPs) and forced to go back or to wait there before passage was permitted (in some cases CP personnel run ID checks before letting the SMM through[3]); restriction of SMM freedom of access and movement was also caused by blocked roads[4]

Notes on data collection and data reading. All collected data showed in Picture 1 to Picture 5 below, display the number of cases in which a violation of Minsk agreement occurred. Data are extrapolated from OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine’s reports[5]  and, please, consider them as purely indicative.

 

Picture 1 - Violations of Minsk agreement Measure 1 (Part 1)
 
Picture 2 - Violations of Minsk agreement Measure 1 (Part 2)
 
Picture 3 - Violations of Minsk agreement Measure 2
 
Picture 4 - Violations of Minsk agreement Measure 3 (Part 1)
 
Picture 5 - Violations of Minsk agreement Measure 3 (Part 2)
 


[1] Area controlled by Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) forces.

[2] Previous Weekly Updates did not consider this kind of violation.

[3] Previous Weekly Updates did not consider this kind of violation.

[4] Previous Weekly Updates did not consider this kind of violation.

[5] http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/daily-updates?page=1.

© All rights reserved

Alessandro Mazzilli

Degree in International Relations at the Faculty of Political Science of the University of Turin.

Expert in Foreign Policy of Defence and Security and the relationships Euro - Atlantic.

Geopolitical analyst.

Consultant Services Stuarding and security checks.

Geoeconomia

Eversione e Terrorismo

Geopolitica

Risorse Energetiche

Cyber Warfare

Copyright CEOS 2012 - 2015. All rights reserved.